President Barack Obama – Fact And Fiction

President Obama

  • Calendar of Posts

    October 2009
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep    
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031

Archive for October 9th, 2009

Judge Carter Trial Date: Update

Posted by alhavakia on October 9, 2009

While Federal Judge Carter was swift in setting a trial date on the Lucas lawsuit, saying that if there were valid concerns pertaining to Obama’s eligibility to serve, the issue should be addressed. Assuring plaintiffs that the case would be decided on merit and would not be dismissed on technicalities, Judge Carter seems to be back stepping in his words and demeanor.

After hearing three hours of arguments, Judge Carter did not make a ruling, saying he needed more time but that a ruling would be forthcoming sometime “later this week.” Well today is Friday and hopefully we will have a ruling before the end of today. Whatever Judge Carter decides, it’s pretty much a sure bet there will be an appeal filed by the losing side.

So why did Judge Carter need more time anyway? Just what is under ‘submission’ and what would legally be deemed ‘valid’ concerns? What must Judge Carter take under review?

The two main factors surrounding this issue are Justiciability and Standing. So let’s look at these two factors closer:

Justiciability is basically whether this suit is the type of ‘matter’ Judge Carter has the authority to adjudicate. Standing which requires certain conditions be met, gets into the technical issues of the case. Three constitutional requirements must be met in order to ‘prove’ standing:

1. Injury
2. Causation
3. Redressability

Injury – in the legal context of this suit, basically requires ‘showing’ a direct “connection to” and “harm from” the ‘action’ being challenged. This injury must be one, the plaintiff has already or will in future, imminently suffer harm. Additionally, this injury must be “within the zone of interests meant to be regulated or protected under the statutory or constitutional guarantee in question.”

Causation – showing of injury to be ‘reasonably’ connected to the defendant’s conduct.

Redressability – A favorable court decision must be likely to redress the injury.

And, in addition to the three constitutional requirements, two other requirements have to be met:

1. A party cannot raise the claims of a third party who is not before the court, and may only assert his or her own rights.
2. A plaintiff cannot sue as a taxpayer who shares a grievance in common with all other taxpayers.

While I have not seen the motion(s) filed on behalf of the defendant [Obama], I do have a copy of the [Lucas] affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff [Captain Pamela Barnett, et al.,] in same lawsuit.

As with the IRS, everything is in the ‘wording’ and whether it displays that ‘standing’ as valid. In other words [literally], if you can cite a cause by law or code, then make a ‘showing’ of interpretation [sometimes very twisted] that would ‘appear’ legitimate – you might expect a favorable ruling on your motion.

From what I have seen of the Obama team, they are very crafty and clever with their ‘use’ of words. But, in this particular case I can’t imagine any wordplay or manipulation of the law, that could ‘reasonably’ be cause for ‘dismissal’ on this suit. Mind you, this is my opinion and I am not a lawyer, much less a Federal Judge. But what I do have is common sense and a ‘reasonably’ fair knowledge of our legal system.

So, now it is up to Judge Carter – and his ‘use’ or choice of wording in HIS interpretation of the laws involved. What say you Judge Carter? Will you render a ruling for discovery [disclosure], so the questions surrounding President Obama’s eligibility can finally be addressed and answered – a right all citizens of this great country are entitled to? Will you order P Obama to submit for ‘foot’ prints, will you order for ‘production’ of all secreted recordations and/or all other documents [college app. allegedly as foreign student] and proof of Citizenship? The ball is in YOUR court [pun intended].

Declaration Affidavit by Lucas Daniel Smith page 1 of 2

Declaration Affidavit by Lucas Daniel Smith page 1 of 2

Declaration Affidavit by Lucas Daniel Smith page 2 of 2

Declaration Affidavit by Lucas Daniel Smith page 2 of 2

Advertisements

Posted in Birth Certificates, breaking news, obama, politics | Tagged: , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Obama Gets Nobel Peace Prize

Posted by alhavakia on October 9, 2009

President Obama says he is ‘humbled’ and honored to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. When I first heard this news this morning, I was sure it was just a bad dream and I would wake up any second. Then I thought it was some type of joke and started surfing the internet. My TV must be possessed, so I can’t trust what I hear there. But my search produced dozens of results, all saying the same thing.

What baffles me the most is the fact that I can’t come up with one example of merit, that would earn Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. I mean, winning an award for ‘vision’ doesn’t quite cut the mustard with me. As to hope … well, I can only hope the United States survives the next 39 months. I must admit though, I have seen lots of ‘change’ in the United States. Not the positive change Obama promised, but the change America got in return for their dollars.

Following is the statement from the Norwegian Nobel Committee:

“The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

“Obama has as president created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama’s initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

“Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.

“For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world’s leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama’s appeal that “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.”

END STATEMENT

OK, so Obama is now the world’s leading spokesman? Well, considering Obama spends his time globe trotting and talking [keyword], then talking some more – yea I can see that statement. But, therein lies (yes, I chose the right word) the problem – all talk. America needs and wants someone who knows how to do more than just talk. We need someone who can walk the walk. We need someone who can deliver something more than hype, cloaked by pretty words. Because once you get past all the fancy wrapping and ribbons – the box is empty.

One could almost imagine Obama as a needy rock star, looking to his fans for validation. He seems to have a need to be worshiped by the masses. And while Obama sings his tune of ‘great change’ I have yet to see anything great. Although, I have seen a number of amazing events brought forth by Obama and his team – but my amazement is one of disbelief!

GOD HAVE MERCY AND BLESS THESE UNITED STATES – That IS our salvation.

Posted in breaking news, obama, politics | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »